Xbox President Sarah Bond’s recent announcement about Xbox’s multi-store future on Windows has sent shockwaves through the gaming industry. If interpreted correctly, we’re about to witness one of the most significant changes in gaming since 2001—a pivotal year that saw Sega exit the hardware race while Microsoft’s Xbox entered it.

The pivot toward a multi-store, platform-agnostic future represents more than just a business strategy—it’s a fundamental reimagining of how we think about gaming ecosystems. By potentially eliminating the traditional console boundaries and embracing a more open, Windows-based approach, Microsoft is betting on accessibility and ubiquity over hardware exclusivity.

This shift could mark the beginning of the end for the traditional console wars, replacing competition based on exclusive hardware with competition based on services, content, and user experience. For developers and publishers, the benefits are clear: reduced costs, simplified workflows, and more focused community building. For gamers, it promises greater flexibility in how and where they access their favourite titles.

But how did we arrive at this crossroads, and how does this pan out for studios, publishers, and gamers?

The Path to This Moment

The writing has been on the wall since 2023, when Microsoft Gaming CEO, Phil Spencer, made surprisingly candid comments about Xbox’s position in the console wars. He acknowledged that Xbox had lost the battle with the Xbox One generation and remained firmly in third place behind Sony and Nintendo. More importantly, Spencer declared there was no war left to win for Xbox—a statement that fundamentally shifted the company’s strategic direction.

Spencer’s comments clearly pointed toward a future centred on GamePass and publishing across as many platforms as possible. But this raised critical questions: Was Xbox preparing to come full circle after 24 years, returning to a no-hardware, software-focused model similar to Sega’s post-Dreamcast strategy?

The Technical Challenge

One of the industry’s biggest uncertainties has been how players would access their existing Xbox libraries if the company stepped away from dedicated hardware. Would it rely entirely on cloud-based access through GamePass? Could there be a pathway to PC versions of console titles, and how would licensing work? Most intriguingly, could Xbox consoles simply run PC games and storefronts, despite the significant hardware differences between consoles and PCs?

Sarah Bond’s Revolutionary Vision

Last week, Sarah Bond provided our clearest indication yet of Xbox’s direction with several key announcements:

• Strategic AMD Partnership: A multiyear collaboration to co-engineer silicon across a portfolio of devices, including next-generation Xbox consoles for both living room and portable gaming
• AI Integration: Enhanced experiences powered by artificial intelligence
• Library Compatibility: Maintaining full compatibility with existing Xbox game libraries
• Multi-Store Access: Delivering Xbox experiences not locked to a single storefront
• Windows Integration: Close collaboration with the Windows team to establish Windows as the premier gaming platform 

The New Gaming Landscape

The final three points are particularly revealing, suggesting a future where Xbox OS may become obsolete. Instead, we could see a simplified ecosystem with just Windows, PlayStation, and Nintendo Switch covering both home and portable gaming (especially if recent PlayStation portable rumours prove accurate).

What This Means for Developers and Publishers

This consolidation would bring substantial benefits across the development pipeline:

• Reduced Development Costs: Fewer platforms translate directly to lower expenses for porting, optimisation, and platform-specific development. Teams can concentrate resources on fewer builds rather than spreading budgets thin across multiple versions.
• Streamlined Quality Assurance: Testing becomes far more manageable with fewer platform variations to validate. QA teams can dedicate more time to thorough testing on remaining platforms instead of rushing through multiple builds with limited time per platform.
• Simplified Marketing and Launch Coordination: Marketing campaigns become less complex when targeting fewer platforms. Launch timing is easier to coordinate, and promotional efforts can be more focused rather than diluted across multiple storefronts and audiences.
• Lower Ongoing Maintenance: Post-launch support becomes more manageable with fewer platforms requiring updates, patches, and technical support. This advantage is magnified for live-service titles, which would require significantly less ongoing investment.
• Reduced Platform Fee Exposure: Fewer platforms mean paying platform fees to fewer entities, potentially improving profit margins while reducing the complexity of revenue tracking and financial reporting.
• More Focused Community Building: Player communities become less fragmented when concentrated on fewer platforms, leading to stronger, more engaged communities and more effective community management.
• Simplified Technical Requirements: Development teams can specialise in fewer sets of technical requirements, APIs, and platform-specific features rather than maintaining expertise across numerous different systems and certification processes.

While questions remain about implementation details and timeline, one thing is certain: the gaming industry is on the brink of its most significant transformation in over two decades. Microsoft’s bold vision could either revolutionise gaming for the better or serve as a cautionary tale about abandoning proven models, and turning their core customer base against them. Either way, we’re witnessing history in the making.

The console wars as we’ve known them may be ending—but the real battle for the future of gaming may well have just begun.

enquiries@trippassociates.co.uk

Martin Tripp Associates is a specialist executive search consultancy. We work globally across the media, information, technology, video games and entertainment sectors, and with some of the world’s biggest brands on communications, digital, marketing, creative, technology, production and leadership roles. Feel free to contact us to discuss.